Video porno xxx italiano chatroulette italiana gratis

video porno xxx italiano chatroulette italiana gratis

most significant measure of counterproductive behavior at Wikipedia and relied instead on the statistical measurement of detecting "reverting/reverted pairs" or "mutually reverting edit pairs". Messer-Kruse, Timothy (February 12, 2012) The 'Undue Weight' of Truth on Wikipedia Archived December 18, 2016, at the Wayback Machine The Chronicle of Higher Education Retrieved March 27, 2014 Colón-Aguirre, Monica Fleming-May, Rachel. The foundation relies on public contributions and grants to fund its mission. The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It  Chapter 6: The Lessons of Wikipedia. 217 Sexism Main article: Gender bias on Wikipedia Wikipedia has been described as harbouring a battleground culture of sexism and harassment. Archived from the original on March 31, 2001. Obtaining the full contents of Wikipedia for reuse presents challenges, since direct cloning via a web crawler is discouraged. The Singularity is Not Near: Slowing Growth of Wikipedia (PDF). Dimitra Kessenides (December 26, 2017). 337 338 Sister projects Wikimedia Main article: Wikimedia project Wikipedia has also spawned several sister projects, which are also wikis run by the Wikimedia Foundation. They have since diverged to some extent. Retrieved January 19, 2012. "Wikimedia Traffic Analysis Report Wikipedia Page Views Per Country". video porno xxx italiano chatroulette italiana gratis Retrieved June 21, 2008. 392) The Journal of Academic Librarianship Retrieved March 27, 2014 Bowling Green News (February 27, 2012) Wikipedia experience sparks national debate Archived August 27, 2016, at the Wayback Machine Bowling Green State University Retrieved March 27, 2014 Wisdom? "Manipulation among the arbiters of collective intelligence: How Wikipedia administrators mold public opinion". "Raw Thought: Who Writes Wikipedia?". 124 Because of this, universities throughout the United States tried to encourage females to become Wikipedia contributors. "Wikipedia falling victim to a war of words". Beyond legal matters, the editorial principles of Wikipedia are embodied in the "five pillars" and in numerous policies and guidelines intended to appropriately shape content. "What If the Great Wikipedia 'Revolution' Was Actually a Reversion? A b c d e f Cohen, Noam (February 9, 2014). Cowen, Tyler (March 14, 2008). Which explains both of the above-elaborated problems. 198 Coverage of topics and selection bias Research conducted by Mark Graham of the Oxford Internet Institute in 2009 indicated that the geographic distribution of article topics is highly uneven. When compared to the top 3,200 educational reference sites in the US, Wikipedia. In April 2005, a Lucene extension 230 231 was added to MediaWiki's built-in search and Wikipedia switched from MySQL to Lucene for searching. 1, capturing.3 of all visits to the category. The latter was started by Sanger in an attempt to create a reliable alternative to Wikipedia. 163 Some commentators quando anuncio malaga renault megane scambisti chat suggest that Wikipedia may be reliable, but that the reliability of any given article is not clear. Through its " Wikipedia Loves Libraries " program, Wikipedia has partnered with major public libraries such as the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts to expand its coverage of underrepresented subjects and articles. Austin Gibbons, David Vetrano, Susan Biancani (2012). "All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view, representing significant views fairly, proportionately and without bias." Sanger, Larry (April 18, 2005). Among Wikipedia editors, this is often phrased as "verifiability, not truth" to express the idea that the readers, not the encyclopedia, are ultimately responsible for checking the truthfulness of the articles and making their own interpretations. "Creating, Destroying, and Restoring Value in Wikipedia" (PDF). Retrieved February 25, 2019. Retrieved October 13, 2007. Originally, rules on the non-English editions of Wikipedia were based on a translation of the rules for the English Wikipedia. "Nature's responses to Encyclopaedia Britannica". "Let's Make a Wiki". Doi :.1007/ _53. It is not rare for articles strongly related to a particular language not to have counterparts in another edition. This Site Wants You".

0 commenti
Lasciare una risposta

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi richiesti sono contrassegnati *